RSS

Tag Archives: movie review

The Family Man 2 – a layman’s review

Shrikant Tiwari, a TASC (NIA) agent, hunts down LTTE terrorists to save the Indian Prime Minister. Amidst flying bullets, we see epithets and F-words and cuss words raining cats and dogs. When characters aren’t using cuss words, they shoot or travel by a Mahindra Scorpio. That is Family Man 2 for the lay man.

Manoj Bajpayee, true to his skills, plays Shrikant Tiwari exceptionally well. While the Prime Minister Ms.Basu is modelled on the lines of Mamta Banerjee, she talks about PM Narendra Modi’s ‘Make in India’ schemes. Basu’s meeting with Sri Lankan President Rupatunga resembles the Modi-Xi meet at Mahabalipuram, for the event is quite recent. Modi’s many overtures to Tamil Nadu finds a mention in Basu’s saying so – ‘maine ithna kiya in logon ko’. Basu doesn’t spot the bindi, a prominent symbol of bengali hindu women. Here again, Mamta Banerjee sneaks in.

The series is a thriller yet has its scenes of cryptic humour. The scenes were Talpade, Shrikant’s assistant, drools over Umaiyal, the police officer from Tamil Nadu, are a treat to watch. Shrikant’s personal life, full of troubles, is an un-welcome distraction though.

The series talks about ISI-LTTE links. Though the LTTE had tried to get help from Palestinian rebels, it has not been fully established that the now defunct LTTE had anything to do with Pakistan’s ISI. Reality was that Pakistan had hobnobbed with Sri Lankan govt to needle India.

The characterisation of the female terrorist, Raji, merits attention. Played brilliantly by Samantha Akkineni, Raji, though the tough fighter that she is, has a soft corner for the Pakistani agent Sajid. This is depicted not so explicitly but becomes visible when, on hearing about his death, Raji stops her dinner midway and moves from the scene abruptly.

The characters of Bhaskaran and Deepan are modelled definitely after LTTE Chief Prabhakaran and LTTE’s chief ideologue Anton Balasingham. However the events that take place are not true. It is true that Balasingham’s words did not carry weight with Prabhakaran in the post 9/11 world and that ultimately led to the obliteration of the LTTE.

Muthu, the TASC office from Tamil Nadu is played brilliantly by Ravindra Vijay. When Talpade talks about ‘South Indian Food’, Muthu asks, which state in South India as there are five states that comprise of South India.

The attention to detail in the series merits attention. When Raji goes into Jebaraj’s home, the poster in the background displays the ‘Eelam’ geography and talks about remembrance. The clock shows 8:15 when Tiwari’s family has its dinner and later, when Tiwari and his wife have a chat, clock shows 8:45. Many such items show the efforts the crew has put in for the production.

A treat to watch – Family Man 2.

P.S.: The executive producer’s name is Rahul Gandhi. And the irony shows.

 
 

Tags: ,

Drishyams – a review

Drishyams – a review

Drishyam -2, sequel to the super hit Drishyam, a malayalam blockbuster, is a continuation of the the struggles and tirades a peace loving minority community family has to go through in this new India run by fascist forces of the majoritarian kind. 

The films not only portray the daily trials and tribulations of a quiet family and its head, but also the daily terror of having to prejudge every moment of existence so as to protect themselves from the aggressively poised officialdom run by the majority maniacs.

While in Drishyam-1, Mohanlal, as George Kutty, had to go to extremes to safeguard the peace in his family, he continues to do that in the sequel to ensure peace and respect to his family. The extents to which a malayalee christian has to go, not to do something spectacular but only to provide a decent livelihood for his family, speaks volumes about the precarous nature of polity in India that is increasingly becoming intolerant towards the minorities. 

Drishyam-1 came about in 2013.  That the writer, Jithu Joseph, had to come up with a sequel in 2020 paints the picture of India post 2014 – the decisive year when India took a draconian turn towards the right and gave up all pretences of being a secular nation safe for the minorities. 

The depiction of the characters speak for themselves. 

Geetha Prabhakar, an IPS officer, is married to a Mr.Prabkarar, an IAS officer. While the IAS controls the civil society, the police wife, in the form of IPS, instills terror in the minds of the cinema loving and not-so-educated George Kutty. It should be noted that this depiction of the people in power, though done subconsciously, presents the India of today, where  the bureaucracy is held by the same group of people who want to destroy the tranquility that prevails in the lives of the minorities, that too, in a progressive state like Kerala.

The extent to which the IAS-IPS duo go to bring trouble to the  peace loving George Kutty family is seen in the manner of purchase of 2 acres of the latter’s land. By using their financial clout, Mr and Mrs Prabhakar ensure that Saritha and Sabu infiltrate into the serene lives of the Goerge Kuttys. 

The Prabhakars are even able to influence the top rungs of the policy hierarchy (Thomas, Phillip) and use them to seek vengeance on the George Kuttys. A tale of damaging the enemy’s eye with his own hand – a device expertly conceptualised and executed by the vengeful Prabhakars, even when they are out of the police and bureaucratic force. One shudders to think what would have happened if the Prabhakars had been part of the bureaucratic setup.

The majoritarian maniacal side of the Prabhakars manifests itself yet again when it makes Thomas, the Inspector General of Police, to begin digging the local church cemetery, much to the consternation of the local bishop. The Prabhakars wouldn’t rest before they disturb those that are awaiting their day of redemption too.

In Drishyam -1, the eatery owner, Ikka, a kind and elderly muslim man is cheated routinely by Sahadevan, a police man. While Ikka can’t retaliate, Sahadevan continues to harangue the former. In Drishyam -2, Ikka continues to be kind and even provides employment to Raghu, a differently enabled worker. Ikka is so kind that he even advises Jose, a on-time-criminal, to find a new livelihood.

While in Drishyam-1 Rani, George Kutty’s wife is practically illiterate in English, even after six years, she continues to be so in Drishyam -2. This is the true state of the minorities in India. Neither can they progress nor can be be educated. While George Kutty has moved on to become a theatre owner, one should not forget the struggles he should have undergone to come up in life. We also come to know from Rani that George Kutty has had to take huge loans to become what he had become. We also need to understand that Rani had to continue to labour and peel the coconut by hand so that the family could come up in life and send the second daughter to a convent.

To sum it up: Drishyam 1 and its sequel are the microcosm of the current state of affairs in India where minorities live in constant fear of their lives and properties. The two movies are nothing but the personification of the India that the country has become since 2014.

P.S.: I expect to be appointed to the editorial board of either The Hindu or Puthiyathalaimurai. 

 
2 Comments

Posted by on February 21, 2021 in English Posts, movie review

 

Tags: ,

பரிணயம் – திரைப் பார்வை

பரிணயம் – திரைப் பார்வை

கேரள நம்பூதிரிகளின் சமூகத்தில் ‘ஸ்மார்த்த விசாரம்’ என்று ஒரு கொடுமை இருந்ததை ஜெயமோஹன் தளத்தில் வாசித்திருந்தேன்.

அதைப் பற்றிய கதை ஒன்றைப் ‘பரிணயம்’ (പരിണയം) என்று திரைப்படமாக எழுத்துள்ளார்கள். எம்.டி.வாசுதேவன் நாயரின் திரைக்கதை அந்தர்ஜனம் என்னும் நம்பூதிரிப் பெண்களின் காணச்சகிக்க முடியாத கண்றாவியான விதவை வாழ்க்கையை நம் கண் முன் நிறுத்துகிறது.

நம்பூதிரிக் கிழவருக்கு நான்காவது தாரமாக இளம் மோஹினி வாழ்க்கைப் படுகிறாள். நம்பூதிரி இறக்க, மோனிகா விதவையாகி, பின்னர் கருவுருகிறாள். கருவிற்குக் காரணம் யாரென்று தெரிந்துகொள்ள நடைபெறும் விசாரணைக்குப் பெயர் ‘ஸ்மார்த்த விசாரம்’.

பெண்ணைத் தனியரையில் அடைத்து ஒரு நம்பூதிரிக் கூட்டம் விசாரிக்கிறது. விசாரணை கொடுமை. அதனினும் கொடுமை, விசாரிக்கிறேன் பேர்வழி என்று வந்த கூட்டம், விருந்து, கேளிக்கை என்று நேரம் கழிப்பது. விசாரிக்கும் நம்பூதிரியாகத் தோன்றும் திலகன் நடிப்பு அபாரம். நெடுமுடி வேணு கேட்கவே வேண்டாம். விடுதலைக்கு முன்பான சமூகச் சூழல், நம்பூதிரி சமூகத்தில் ஏற்படும் ஆரம்ப கட்ட முற்போக்குச் சிந்தனை இயக்கம் பற்றிய குறிப்பும் திரைப்படத்தில் உள்ளது. பிராமணர்களுக்கான ‘ஊட்டுப்புரை’ சங்கதியும் தொட்டுக் காட்டப் படுகிறது.

கதையின் வசன அமைப்பில் சங்கிலித் தொடர் போன்ற ஒட்டு வெளிப்படை. குரியெடத்து தாத்ரியின் ஸ்மார்த்த விசாரம் என்னும் நிகழ்வு புகழ் பெற்றது. தாத்ரியின் தொடர்பில் இருந்தவர்கள் எண்ணில் அடங்காமல் போக, ராஜா அதனை நிறுத்த வேண்டி இருந்தது என்பது வரலாறு. அந்த வரலாற்றின் அடிப்படையில் எழுதப்பட்ட கதை என்று தோன்றும் விதமாக வசனம் உள்ளது. தாத்ரியின் விஷயத்தில் பல குற்றவாளிகள் வெளிவருவர். மோஹினி தனது கோழைக் காதலனை நிராகரித்து, இறுதியில் அவன் ஏற்ற பாத்திரங்களையே தனது கணவர்களாகக் கூறுவது தாத்ரியின் வழக்குடன் ஒப்பிட வழிகோலுகிறது.தனது காதலனை நிராகரிக்கும் மோஹினி, காந்தியடிகளின் கதராடை இயக்கத்தில் ஈடுபடுவது போல் திரைப்படம் நிறைவுறுகிறது.

பெண்கள் முன்னேற்றத்தில் காந்தியடிகளின் கதராடை இயக்கத்தின் பங்கு தொட்டுக் காட்டப்படுவது நிறைவாக உள்ளது. மனதை வருத்தும் நிகழ்வுகள், கொடுஞ்சொற்கள், பெண்களின் நிலை என்று பல தளங்களில் மனதைப் பாதிக்கும் திரைப்படம் ‘பரிணயம்’.

 
Leave a comment

Posted by on February 12, 2021 in movie review

 

Tags:

Desaadanam – movie review

Desaadanam – movie review

This film can’t be made in Tamil. Thank you Mollywood for producing such a poignant movie on a subject that has never been spoken about in the south indian movie scene. ‘Desaadanam’, the poignant movie that doesn’t shout yet delivers the cornucopia of human emotions in a non-intrusive manner, is a delight to watch.

Panchu, a namboodiri brahmin boy of 8 years or so, is so gifted that he is well versed in the dharmic school. His excellence attracts the attention of a religious order of the Advaidic thought and the pontiff of the Mutt asks for Panchu’s ordainment as the next Acharya.

The trials and tribulations of a loving family that consists of an octogenarian grandfather, a caring father and a doting mother are depicted in a most elegant manner in the movie.

Scenes where the child performs the annual remembrance rituals for this family members who are alive and to himself (Atma Shradham) when he moves from joyous childhood to a sudden monk-hood would move viewers to tears. Just in case you understand the Sanskrit mantras recited in those scenes, the effect would multiply manifold.

While parental emotions are to be expected, the portrayal of innocent friendship that Panchu has with Devikutti, a girl of his age, is authentic. While the children fight for some nuts earlier on in the movie and try to snatch from each other, once Panchu becomes a monk, she accepts a sweet from him as a holy prasad. Metaphors such as this galore.

Music is soothing to the ears, with the background scores non existent in most places where deep human emotions are adequately sufficient to carry forward the scenes. In such frames the music director makes his presence felt by the absence of his music. Well judged.

The movie doesn’t preach, fight for perceived injustices and abuse the viewer’s senses but is a treat to watch. The movie has won a national award, and rightfully so.

Don’t miss it, at any cost. Available on Amazon Prime.

Once you watch, write a line in this site about your experience.

 
3 Comments

Posted by on January 15, 2021 in English Posts, movie review

 

Tags:

What does the film ‘Draupathi’ represent?

Tamil film Draupathi, shot within a Rs 50 lakh budget, is an abject failure, on many counts. Here are some pointers:

  1. Lacks technical finesse
  2. Characterisation sucks
  3. Characters speak dramatic lingo
  4. Screen play is a drag and is predictable
  5.  Dialogue delivery is a drag too
  6. Too many issues to address – methane, hydrocarbon, sand mafia et al.
  7. Rushed scenes
  8. List continues …

With all the above, what is the need for this movie? Does it provide any entertainment value? Is it worth the time?

Draupati Movie

So, what did the movie Draupathi and its director Mohan achieve, if at all, in this movie that has all the above disdainful characteristics?

The movie and the director have:

  1. brought out the voice of the so-far-not-spoken castes of Tamil Nadu.
  2. made it known that alternate voices do exist in the state.
  3. debunked the ‘no-caste-in-Tamil-Nadu’ theory.
  4. punctured the utopian theories of dravidian politics that have so far sought to whitewash heinous crimes under the guise of ‘social justice’.
  5. established that while it is correct to talk about ‘honour-killings’, it is equally correct to talk about ‘staged-marriages’.
  6. established a new trend in Tamil cinema.

This film has evoked predictably lack lustre and downright irreverential response from The Hindu and The New Indian Express while evoking strong resentment from the so-called Periarists and Pseudo-Secularists. These make this film a mandatory watch. Even more predictably, the movie had met with resistance from the time its teaser was released.

In the late 80s, yet another Tamil film, “Ore Oru Gramathile’, a movie that was far ahead of its times to have portrayed a brahmin girl misusing reservation meant for scheduled tribes and becoming an IAS officer, was opposed tooth and nail by the dravidian parties who forced the director to make several cuts in the movie. ‘If any idea arises that contradicts the popular narrative, it has to be nipped in the bud’ was the version of ‘freedom of expression’ practised in the Rationalist Republic of Tamil Nadu, then. Much water has flown since, and therefore ‘Draupati’ didn’t meet the fate of ‘Ore Oru Gramathile’.

I had witnessed such orchestrated-love-marriages in Neyveli during the 80s and 90s. Every six months my father would come home from office and begin to narrate a melancholy – that of an Iyengar girl eloping with a dalit / christian  employee. This became so predictable that when ever he came home angry and tired, we could guess some story on those lines.

Many years later I came to know about such orchestrated-love-marriages first hand. While I was a student of Salem Govt Engineering College in the early nineties, I had fallen sick. As I was running very high temperature in the dead of night, my hostel mate Vamsee had taken me to Omalur, a nearby village, in search of a doctor. The first one that we could find, after administering emergency an injection, began talking to me in brahmanical Iyengar Tamil. Flabbergasted, I looked up in surprise, even though I was dead tired, to hear a shocking truth. ‘I am an SC. My wife is a Thenkalai Iyengar from Sri Rangam. I have enjoyed government reservation in studies. But I wanted my children to be intelligent. Hence enticed an iyengar girl into falling in love with me. This is an organised cartel that funds such attempts’.

‘Why Iyengar girls?’ I had asked.

‘Suppose a dalit child and a paapppaara child ( brahmin child) return from school. While the paappaara child would start studying immediately after coming from school, the dalit child would go hunting and playing in the wild. To overcome this genetic trait, we get an upper-caste marriage for intelligent genes and reservation for studies’. The doctor had elaborated on several such episodes to a weak and ailing yours truly. ‘Would genes be intelligent? Would they get transmitted to the progeny in the right proportion?’ I had wanted to ask, but felt too weak to even wag my tongue.

That incident opened my eyes to another dimension in life. And this orchestrated-fake-marriages came to light in a 2014 judgement of the Madras High Court, which is what has been depicted in the movie ‘Draupati’. The courage to depict this almost- forgotten judgment is reason enough to view the movie.

Just because Dr.Ramadoss, the leader of a regional political party, had supported the movie, it doesn’t, in any way, eradicate and belittle the movie content or the truth embedded into the story of the film. While yet another brilliant Tamil movie about the atrocities on Dalits – Asuran – ( based on a novel by name ‘Vekkai’) was well received by movie loving Tamil Nadu and hailed as ‘true depiction of dalit oppression, it appears to be beyond reason not to celebrate ‘Draupati’ with the same euphoria and pomp.

While it is true that Vanniar community in Tamil Nadu has been majorly affected by the ‘orchestrated-love-marriage’ criminal act, there are other communities like Devar, Gounder, Chettiar and Pillaimar who have suffered to a great extent, so much so, that the wealthy Chettiars in villages around Panruti in Tamil Nadu get their daughters married off as soon as they enter colleges, lest they be subjected to such cheat-marriages in college. A Chettiar friend of mine from Panruti recently got his niece, a first year student in a local college, married off within his community. The girl, after marriage, would continue to be in her parent’s house and would move to her husband’s home on completing her studies. And this arrangement is guaranteed by the elders in the community. Call it innovation, but this is a trick to prevent a clear and present danger, for orchestrated-marriage racket happens mostly in colleges, especially during the summer vacations.

What irked me in the movie?

While no other caste is depicted explicitly in the movie, there is an exception to the caste of the sub-registrar who is shown to sport the Sri Churnam ( the yellow line in the forehead depicting Goddess Mahalakshmi) in the office scenes and to sport the traditional panacha kachcham at home and being bare bodied and thus exposing the sacred thread. I know that it is the norm in any Tamil movie to explicitly call out brahmin characters, so much so, that a do-gooder brahmin would seem utopian. I consoled myself with the thought that the evil sub-registrar was bare bodied and in a panacha kachcham as he was preparing to leave for Tirumala (not sure who would travel bare bodied all the way from Chennai to Tirumala). Also how many brahmin sub-registrars exist in Tamil Nadu these days?

Lest left-liberal-pseudo-secular-evangelical-luddites should pounce on me for supporting a supposedly mid-casteist film, here is my review of an out and out dalit film.

P.S.: I had not visited a movie theatre in India in the last 15 years. I made an exception this time, bought a ticket and watched this movie in a theatre in Chennai, for I felt that the director and his ilk needed to be encouraged to produce movies that reflect societal reality.

Ref:

  1. News items in 2014 on Fake Marriages
  2. Ramadoss video on Fake Marriages
  3. Indian Express review of Pari Yerum Perumal
  4. The Hindu review of Pari Yerum Perumal
  5. The Hindu review of Draupathi
  6. Indian Express review of Draupathi

 

 

 
Leave a comment

Posted by on March 7, 2020 in Writers

 

Tags: , , , ,

Pari Yerum Perumal & others

The hype around the Tamil movie ‘Pari Yerum Perumal’,prompted me to watch this poignant story of discrimination based on caste.

 The story is based in Tirunelveli, in Southern Tamil Nadu, known for its caste based classifications and violence. People got killed for marrying out of caste, though such instances are declining, thankfully.

This film talks about the heinous treatment met to the lowest strata of the caste hierarchy – the dalits – in a government law college. The story is poignant, direction excels, metaphors glitter and the movie leaves one with a deep sense of exasperation and helplessness.

Let me get this straight. This is one hell of a film that hits one on the face, with a sledge hammer soaked in the reality called caste discrimination.

But, why should this situation prevail after 70 years of national independence and a 40 year state rule by the so-called backward communities? Did not the ‘Dravidian Rule’ result in overcoming the past structures?  This model of questioning would open up the simmering wounds that refuse to heal though artificially stitched for the last 40 years and made to appear as though all was well in the subaltern.

Were not Annadurai and Periyar Ramasamy Naicker, the much deified leaders in TN, supposed to have demolished the caste hierarchies in the state and made Tamil Nadu a ‘model’ , ‘rationalist’ and  an ‘egalitarian’ state for other ‘backward’ northern Indian states to follow? What happened to the long handed out history that has been proclaiming from the rooftops of the dawn of such an elite state in India?

If the scenarios depicted in the film are true -yes, they are true as most of the incidents are from real life acts in the state- then should we rewrite the history books in Tamil Nadu and throw the names, Annadurai and Ramasamy Naicker, to the dustbins of history?

The ending scene where two glasses, one with left over tea+milk and the other with just tea, depicts the reality in the state – that caste differences exist. The subtle message couldn’t have been conveyed with any other metaphor, for the prevailing ‘Two-Tumbler’ system in Southern Tamil Nadu cannot be hid under the carpet to paint a rosy picture in the state. 

Then there is the usual spineless caricature of the brahmins – the scene in TASMAC, the state run liquor shop, where a fellow drinker is shown as one wearing three strokes of the sacred ash and sporting a half open shirt that exposes a wrongly worn sacred thread while mouthing the peculiar lingo of the brahmins (‘mama jammnunu irukken paaru’). The liquor consuming brahmin had no role to play in the film. He appeared just for that scene. Then why should he sport the sacred ash, wear the sacred thread in a publicly visible fashion and mouth brahmin oriented lingo? Could that character not have been anybody else without any caste indicators? 

No Tamil film worth its salt is complete without such a down right racist and wanton degrading depiction of the brahmin community. Unless rabid hatred is infused into the genes, such a depiction is not possible.

Let us look at some Tamil films that have such rabid anti-brahmin sentiments.

The case about Kalam Hasan’s film ‘Virumandi’ is worth a look here. Leaving along the conflict regarding the title ( Sandiyar Vs Virumandi), the movie depicted a conflict between the militant Thevar community and a numerically minuscule Telugu speaking Naickers in southern districts of Tamil Nadu. The irony is that there is no conflict between Naickers and Thevars, both being wealthy land owning classes from the feudal setup. The real conflict in the southern states was between Thevars, the feudal landlords and Dalits, the landless exploited group. But portraying reality could have cost the film its very right to be screened. Could any movie maker worth his name make a movie on the annual ceremony to the legendary freedom fighter ( and a representative of the Thevar community) Muthuramalinga Thevar and the rise in tension in the region due to Dalit resentment opposing the ceremony?

The recent Tamil blockbuster ‘Kolamavu Kokila’ had a Brahmin character, with a ‘Sri Churnam’ – the traditional red mark that the Iyengar brahmins wear on their forehead – playing the role of a pimp. What is the obsession with ‘Sri Churnam’ is a question for sociologists to answer.

Kamal Haasan’s super hit movie ‘Viswaroopam’ had him play the role of a spy in the guise of a Brahmin that cooked chicken for his Brahmin wife that loved chicken. The wife works in the USA as an oncologist and Kamal Haasan is a live at home husband that tutors girls in Bharatnatyam. The role of a docile Brahmin is in direct contrast to a jihadi hunting spy is an excellent contrast, no doubt, and brought the extreme traits meet at a common point. But why should Kamal Haasan be shown as cooking chicken which he admits not to consume it in the film? And why should the wife be depicted as consuming the same? What kind of a retarded depiction is this?

Yet another Tamil film by name ‘Joker’ had another ‘Sri Churnam’ sporting assistant to a minister. Nothing wrong except that the assistant utters holy hymns of the saintly Azhwars ( 8th Century Vaishnavite saints) at the most inappropriate of places and occasions, one being near a toilet. There was no connection what so ever. Any comical relief that was sought to be brought never happened.

Let us come back to Pari Yerum Perumal.

Take the case of the English professor who punishes the protagonist and his friend for being grossly ill-equipped in English. In the scene where he chastises the duo, he is shown with a clean forehead. In the scene where he recommends suspension of the protagonist for entering into the ladies’s room, the Professor is shown as wearing the ‘Sri Churnam’. Note the connection – Sri Churnam –> Iyengar –> English –> Punishment for not being proficient enough in English and therefore anti-dalit. 

Would the film have depicted a devout muslim, wearing a skull-cap, consuming liquor or a christian, wearing the holy cross, chastising the Dalit protagonist? The film didn’t even provide a hint of the caste of the oppressors in the film. And that is ‘Social Justice’ for the uninitiated.

In spite of these traditional lacunae, the film ‘Pari Yerum Perumal’ is a tight slap on the collective conscience of the dravidian strain of politics in the “Rational Republic of Tamil Nadu’. 

The vicious brahmin-hatred ingested into Tamil cinema’s blood stream in the last 50 years rears its ugly head in incremental fashion, from time to time, and makes its presence felt. Now the venom has permeated into the genes, thereby successive directors have inherited the trait and are depicting the same in some form and measure, without fail.  

Compare these films with gems such as ‘Asthu’, a Marathi film, on the Alzheimer afflicted Sanskrit Professor. Though I would want to ask ‘When would Tamil movie industry produce such films?’, I don’t expect any introspection and correction in the Tamil cinema community, for the pedigree speaks for itself through the films it produces.

      

 
3 Comments

Posted by on November 26, 2018 in English Posts

 

Tags: , , , , ,

நடிகையர் திலகம் – Movie Review

The Tamil film ‘நடிகையர் திலகம்’ (Queen among the female actors) is a biopic that glorifies an actor to the extent that it does injustice to her husband.

Savithri, the erstwhile lead actor in Tamil that the film is based on, was supposed to have been the female equivalent of the then doyen of Tamil film industry – Sivaji Ganesan. There was supposed to be no role that she could not emulate.

nadikaiyar_thilakam

The film portrays the meteoric rise, the path of slow and painful decline and ultimately the pathetic end of Savithri. Gemini Ganesan, the then male superstar and heart throb of girls of that age, is painted in a bad light and is shown to be the precursor to the decline and demise of Savithri.

Given the headstrong nature of Savitri, she had never heeded sane advice and had ventured into uncharted territory – film direction and production.

The biopic could have covered the different conspiracy theories that had surrounded the life and times of Savithri and Gemini Ganesan. The film does not speak of the role of another leading female actor of those times, Banumathi, who was supposed to have enticed Savithri to produce films. What had made Banumathi to lure Savithri into this film production business, did Gemini Ganesan have any role in this, was there anyone else behind this ill-thought out move, what transpired between Savithri and Chandrababu, a comedy superstar who also had a sad end – the film could have investigated on these lines.

When Savithri, the then reigning superstar was undergoing such turmoil in her finances, what did the the other leading movie players do? What was Sivaji’s stand? Did MGR, an erstwhile superstar and the then Chief Minister of the state, do anything to ameliorate Savithri’s sufferings? What did the film industry associations do? Had these been addressed, the biopic would have given a complete perspective of the situation that prevailed in the state in general and Tamil film industry in particular. A chance missed.

The film meanders on an unnecessary love story of an investigative journalist while trying to provide a third person narrative to the biopic. The time spent in these sequences could have been better spent in going over the intertwining factors behind the decline of a gifted actor Savithri.

Malayalam actor Keerthi Suresh dons the role of Savithri and her performance is a treat. She speaks more through her eyes like what Savithri was supposed to have done. She emotes Savitri so much so that, at times, the viewer begins to see Savithri in Keerthi Suresh. Dilqar Salman, who plays Gemini Ganesan, does justice with the necessary dose of tom boyishness and grace.

The scene transition between two films that run in parallel and that too entangled with the personal lives of Gemini and Savitri, the color transition from black and white image to color costumes of the then real life characters, the then Madras’s imagery, the mellifluous background score and an outstanding song that brings out the romance between Gemini and Savithri and many more finer aspects of the movie bring out the needed talent that the Tamil movie industry has, but seldom uses.

‘Nadigaiyar Thilakam’  — one-sided biopic, supported well by the lead actors, but laid waste due to unnecessary characters and a not-so-needed sub-story line. The surprise upside – the discovery of a great talent ‘Keerthi Suresh’.

A welcome different attempt in the Tamil / Telugu film industry. Hope more of such emerge on the life and times of Jayalalithaa, yet another enigma and a power to reckon with until her mysterious death in 2016.

 

Tags: , ,

अस्तु – ( So Be It ) – Movie Review

What a movie! 

‘Asthu’ (अस्तु), a Marathi movie that revolves around an Alzheimer  patient excels in many spheres and takes mainstream cinema to a different level. 

Dr.Chakrapani Sastry, a retired Sanskrit scholar, afflicted with dementia, forgets even his daughter’s names, yet is able to recall relevant verses from ancient texts that suit the occasion. He gets lost, follows an elephant and is taken care of by the mahout’s family for a day. The struggles that Sastry’s daughter Irawati undergoes to find him forms the crux of the story.

astu-so-be-it-marathi-movieSastry’s slow descent into dementia is well captured. The scenes where the mahout’s wife takes care of the scholar have deep philosophical undertones bordering on Karma and the like. These scenes are bound to bring tears to the viewer.

The transitions from one scene to the other, through the eyes of the daughter, are well made , with an object or verse in the preceding scene acting as the connector to the succeeding one. Eg – The miniature elephant souvenir in a scene followed by the one that shows the actual elephant Lakshmi.

Irawati Harshe plays Irawati, daughter of Sastry. Her controlled and graded emotional outbursts are a treat to watch. Milind Soman plays a supporting husband and an understanding son-in-law. 

The mahout and his wife (Amruta Subash) glitter in their performances, the latter stealing all the scenes effortlessly. 

Dr.Mohan Agashe, a real life Psychiatrist, plays Dr.Chakrapani Sastry and anchors the film all the way through. A man that doesn’t remember anything, following an elephant that is supposed to remember everything, is an interesting aspect of the film.

I particularly liked the steady stream of jingling noise made by Irawati’s bangles. The Kannada-Konkani-Marathi lullaby that the mahout’s wife sings is bound to anchor you to the seat. The lullaby makes all the characters sleep, and that includes the elephant.

The mahout’s daughter is a silent performer. She never spoke a word, but captured my heart.

It is an honour to watch the film. I honoured myself twice.

 
8 Comments

Posted by on May 27, 2018 in English Posts, Writers

 

Tags: , ,

Buddha in a traffic jam – my review

Disclaimer: I don’t watch movies. I watch documentaries. Hence my opinions about a movie could be farther away from the mainstream movie review industry.

‘BITJ’ is a lone right wing movie that has all the right content and intent.

BITJ speaks the truth about urban naxals, their methods and their infiltration in the mainstream world. While it is the obvious truth in India, one wouldn’t have heard of this being spoken in the public space. For, the space is occupied by the urban naxals themselves.

BITJ speaks truth to the untruthful world, but does a lack lustre job of painting a cohesive picture.

The film looks at the dichotomy in the world through the eyes of a management student. The student gets to know about tribals, naxalites, government forces out to destroy the naxalites, some lessons on socialism, academic infiltration by the naxalites, love, middlemen who prevent genuine development of the tribals and many other things. The film is all over the place.

The movie shows elite, ever-smoking, ever-boozing students in an even more elite business school. Probably, the only time the guys and girls don’t smoke is when they sleep.

BITJ is a valiant attempt at portraying truth, but seems to meander around with lectures and pontifications.

In any case, the director Vivek Agnihotri deserves praise for his avant garde effort to speak a truth that is not spoken at all, for the repercussions from Bollywood, academia and media would be too heavy to bear. He withstood the media onslaught, physical violence unleashed on him due to the film, and a general exorcism by the media-academia-industry establishment.

His soon to be released book by name ‘Urban Naxals’ is expected to speak on the trials and tribulations that the director had to undergo prior to and after the release of the film.

Kudos to the director-author Vivek Agnihotri.

 

 
Leave a comment

Posted by on May 7, 2018 in Writers

 

Tags: ,

 
%d bloggers like this: